Click it and Unblock the Notifications
“No Parking, No Car” - Mumbai's Car Buying Rules To Get Stricter
Looking to buy a car? Well, if you're living in Maharashtra, you better ensure that you have a valid parking spot if the latest proposal by the state government goes through.
This proposal is aimed at easing parking congestion and parking shortages in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR), which spans 6,328 square kilometres as well as Pune and Nagpur. The MMR area includes Mumbai and its surrounding satellite towns and has a population exceeding 26 million.
Speaking about the proposal, Maharashtra Transport Minister Pratap Sarnaik said, "We are looking to construct parking spaces. Development rules should be followed, and developers must provide parking with flats. We will not register new vehicles if the buyer doesn't have a certificate of parking space allotment from the concerned civic body."
One of the ways the state government is looking at easing traffic congestion and parking woes is by building parking facilities beneath recreational grounds in the cities. The government also plans to identify and catalogue currently available parking spaces and assign unique identifiers to them. Other proposals being considered include pod taxis.
Maharashtra's "No parking space, no car" policy isn't the first time a proposal like this has come up in India. A similar proposal was recently adopted in Chennai, the capital city of the state of Tamil Nadu. Tamil Nadu is set to encourage shared parking facilities in private buildings like gated communities and malls, which will be made available to the public for a weekly or monthly charge.
Outside of India, Tokyo, the capital of Japan was the first city to adopt a proof-of-parking law way back in 1962. Citizens of Tokyo usually rent paid parking spots as overnight parking on the streets is banned in many Japanese cities. London, on the other hand, limits the use of vehicles in the city centre with its Ultra Low Emissions Zone charges, while in Hong Kong there are parking taxes to help discourage congestion.
"No Parking, No Car" Pros and Cons: A Double-Edged Move
Like any bold policy, the "no parking, no car" has its champions and critics. The pros include:
- Traffic relief: By forcing new cars to have homes, the policy could curb chaotic roadside parking, keep lanes clear for ambulances and ease congestion. Developers will also have to add more parking, boosting supply in the long run (beneath parks or malls, as officials suggest).
- Better planning: It instills discipline. People (and builders) will think twice about how many cars they actually need. It could accelerate investment in garages and EV charging since parking will be an official prerequisite for a vehicle.
- Promotes public transport: If buyers can't secure parking, they might reconsider and rely more on Mumbai's new metro lines and buses as well as its famous local trains - reducing the increase in the number of cars on the streets.
But there are clear downsides, especially for the middle class:
- Extra burden: First-time car owners now face one more hurdle - proving they have parking. In cities where owning even a small home is a struggle, this feels like a tax on aspiration. People renting apartments might have to sign rental agreements for parking or pay high monthly fees.
- Equity concerns: Strict proofs could disadvantage those in older neighbourhoods with limited on-site parking. The rule nominally allows public lot spots, but available slots are far outnumbered by cars needed. It's unclear how easy (and free) it will be for an ordinary buyer to lease or get a "public parking certificate."
- Market effects: Car prices could creep up (as sellers and buyers negotiate parking deals), and the used-car market might get complicated by parking stipulations. There's even a risk of black-market parking certificates or long waits for public slots.
Continue with Google